tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11168006.post2523651975005199003..comments2024-02-15T22:31:01.027-07:00Comments on Business SOA: Why Service SLA depends on consumers as much as producers (Sandisk Ultra II v Extreme III)Steve Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18324989580856894788noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11168006.post-91741133534898619282007-07-30T13:53:00.000-07:002007-07-30T13:53:00.000-07:00Udi, Again that is a nice point that you raise, I'...Udi, <BR/><BR/>Again that is a nice point that you raise, I'm actually the consumer of the total Camera + Card service, in other words there is yet another SLA which is a combination (in terms of pictures per second) SLA.<BR/><BR/>The card is the service for the camera (if not for me) however as the camera uses it as a storage device, and can accept multiple cards behind a single consistent Steve Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18324989580856894788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11168006.post-70380854162248667932007-07-30T13:30:00.000-07:002007-07-30T13:30:00.000-07:00I'm not sure if I only disagree with your example,...I'm not sure if I only disagree with your example, but here are my thoughts:<BR/><BR/>The memory card is not what the service in this case. The camera is. The fact that someone (you) upgraded some of the internals of the camera does not necessarily change its SLA. Your expectation that the end result of that upgrade should have been an overall improvement may not have been met, but that in no wayAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com