PeopleYes folks the thing that will actually make or break your systems in the majority of cases will be the people. This means the talent of the people defining and delivering and the cultural changes in the wider organisation to accept and take advantage of the services effectively.
All too often in IT's obsession with technology we argue about the pointless and ignore the critical. If your SOA strategy and direction isn't centred around the people and practice changes, then it won't deliver the benefits you expect.
Technorati Tags: SOA, Service Architecture
5 comments:
Looking at your previous posting, "Want to be cool? Learn REST. Want a career? Learn WS."
Aren't you one of the people arguing about the meaningless REST v WS argument?
I'm arguing about the meaninglessness of the argument... hell I never thought I'd get to use this word properly... I've been accused of floccinaucinihilipilification with regards to REST v WS-*, but no-one yet has managed to show any true value in the discussion.... hence somewhat bizarrely I've started arguments on exactly the floccinaucinihilipilification of REST v WS-*.
Would that be antifloccinaucinihilipilification?
Interestingly enough, following the discussion has lead me to a deeper understanding of the issues involved than I ever got from reading most of the literature on the subject (which is really the whole point of discussing things). I suspect the issues raised in the discussion will have a value that long outlasts the standards themselves.
I therefore dismiss as worthless your dismissal as worthless of the discussion.
Would that be antofloccinaucinihilipilification?
Great post on key issues that drive project success or failure. I've posted about this article here.
Michael Krigsman
http://projectfailures.com
Its a very nice blog for...
architects in bangalore , architects in bangalore , interior designers in Bangalore , interior designers in Bangalore , architects in bangalore , architects in bangalore , interior designers in bangalore
Post a Comment